eGFR-THE BETTER PREDICTOR IN CKD IN INDIAN POPULATION

Authors

  • G. Deepika Annai Medical college & Hospital, Pennalur, Sriperumbadur, Kanchipuram, Chennai.
  • N. Veeraiah Annai Medical college & Hospital, Pennalur, Sriperumbadur, Kanchipuram, Chennai.
  • K. Shri Krishna Annai Medical college & Hospital, Pennalur, Sriperumbadur, Kanchipuram, Chennai.
  • B.S.V. Sastry Annai Medical college & Hospital, Pennalur, Sriperumbadur, Kanchipuram, Chennai.
  • Priyamohan Mohant Annai Medical college & Hospital, Pennalur, Sriperumbadur, Kanchipuram, Chennai.

Keywords:

S. Creatinine, glomerular filtration rate, Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases (MDRD), Cockcroft-Gault.

Abstract

 To compare S. Creatinine & estimated GFR the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by using Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and Modification of Diet in Renal Diseases (MDRD) formula in diabetics and hypertensive is the best overall index of renal function in health and disease. Insulin clearance is the gold standard but since it is time consuming and is invasive technique it is poorly specified.

The study was conducted retrospectively reviewed individuals in a hospital on A total number of 320 cases from dec 2013 to dec 2014 in them 120 cases of type II DM, 120 cases of hypertensives and 100 cases of both type II DM and hypertensive patients of age group between 20-70Years who had a Macrovascular complication chronic kidney disease, according to their stages of CKD, as stages I,II,III,IV,V. THE Serum Creatinine was calculated and compared with Cockcrost-Gault and MDRD approaching Annai Medical college & hospital, Pennalur, Sriperumbadur, Chennai.

GFR Estimation (e GFR): MDRD study Equation (GFR ml/min/1.073m2 r GFR = 186 × (S Cr) -1.154 × (age)-0.203 × (0.742 if female) × (1.210 if African American) Cockcrost-Gault (CG ml/min0 = (140-age) × weight /0.85 (if females)/ (SCr Mean ±SD of S. Creatinine, MDRD and cock craft & Gault S.Creatinine increased and eGFR is decreased in stages III, IV,V of CKD when Compared to stages I , II. CKD is taking under stages comparing with eGFR ,MDRD equation and Cockcroft-Gault formula .see the statistical data eGFR is high the serum creatinine is decreased ,s.creatinene increased eGFR is decreased but statically significance in s.creatinine is  the p 0.01 ,MDRD p value <0.001 and  Cockcroft-Gault p ≤0.05. This shows us that MDRD p <0.001 is highly significant  than S.Creatinine and Cock craft & Gault.

MDRD study is most significant than Cock graft & gaults S- Creatinine in predicting the risk and for instituting appropriate therapy to reduce the incidence of the chronic kidney disease e GFR is better predictor

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Levey , Kausz , and perrone: Division of Nephrology, New England Medical Center , Box 391, 750 Washington street , Boston, MA 02111.National Kidney Foundation Practice Guidelenes for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evalution, Classification, and Strtificstion.

Tietz txt book of clinical chemistry 4th edition pages 84-88

Richard j.glossock, and Christopher winearls clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:1563-1568, 2008Screening for CKD with eGFR.

Stevens LA, Levey AS. Measured GFR as a confirmatory test for estimated GFR. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(11):2305-2313.

Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.Nephron. 1976;16(1):31-41.

Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in theModification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation for estimating glomerular filtrationrate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4):247-254.

Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604-612.

Stevens LA, Manzi J, Levey AS, et al. Impact of creatinine calibration on performance of GFR estimating equations in a pooled individual patient database. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;50(1):21-35.

R.N. Foley P.S. Parfrey M.J. Sarnak Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease Am J Kidney Dis 32 1998S112 S119

C.M. Bell R.H. Chapman P.W. Stone An off-the-shelf help list: a comprehensive catalog of preference scores from published cost-utility analyses Med Decision Making 21 2001 288 294

G. Mazzucco T. Bertani M. Fortunato Different patterns of renal damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicentric study on 393 biopsies Am J Kidney Dis 39 2002 713 720

V. Gambara G. Mecca G. Remuzzi Heterogeneous nature of renal lesions in type II diabetes J Am Soc Nephrol 3 1993 1458 1466

Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van LF, Greene T, Coresh J.: A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150: 604–612, 2009.

Froissart M, Rossert J, Jacquot C, Paillard M, Houillier P.: Predictive performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 763– 773, 2005 [PubMed].

Rigalleau V, Lasseur C, Perlemoine C, Barthe N, Raffaitin C, Chauveau P, Combe C, Gin H.: Cockcroft- Gault formula is biased by body weight in diabetic patients with renal impairment. Metabolism 55: 108– 112, 2006

Poggio ED, Wang X, Weinstein DM, Issa N, Dennis VW, Braun WE, Hall PM.: Assessing glomerular filtration rate by estimation equations in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 6: 100–108, 2006.

Donadio C, Consani C, Ardini M, Caprio F, Grassi G, Lucchesi A.: Prediction of glomerular filtration rate from body cell mass and plasma creatinine. Curr Drug Discov Technol 1: 221–228, 2004.

Cirillo M, Anastasio P, De Santo NG.: Relationship of gender, age, and body mass index to errors in predicted kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20: 1791–1798, 2005.

Fontsere N, Bonal J, Navarro M, Riba J, Fraile M, Torres F, Romero R.: A comparison of prediction equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in adult patients with chronic kidney disease stages 4–5: Effect of nutritional status and age. Nephron Clin Pract 104: c160–c168, 2006.

Verhave JC, Fesler P, Ribstein J, du Cailar G, Mimran A.: Estimation of renal function in subjects with normal serum creatinine levels: Influence of age and body mass index. Am J Kidney Dis 46: 233–241, 2005.

White CA, Huang D, Akbari A, Garland J, Knoll GA.: Performance of creatinine-based estimates of GFR in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis 51: 1005–1015, 2008.

Cirillo M, Anastasio P, De Santo NG.: Relationship of gender, age, and body mass index to errors in predicted kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20: 1791–1798, 2005.

Michels WM, Grootendorst DC, Rozemeijer K, Dekker FW, Krediet RT.: Glomerular filtration rate measurements by (125)I-iothalamate should be corrected for inaccurate urine collections with (131)I- hippuran. Clin Nephrol 72: 337–343, 2009.

Published

2016-07-15

How to Cite

G. Deepika, N. Veeraiah, K. Shri Krishna, Sastry, B., & Mohant, P. . (2016). eGFR-THE BETTER PREDICTOR IN CKD IN INDIAN POPULATION. International Journal of Research and Development in Pharmacy & Life Sciences, 5(4), 2226-2231. Retrieved from https://www.ijrdpl.com/index.php/ijrdpl/article/view/242