Formulation and evaluation of Buccal patches of Furosemide

Authors

  • Aspee Singh Institute of Pharmacy, Bundelkhand University Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Upendra Kumar Sharma Institute of Pharmacy, Bundelkhand University Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/IJRDPL.2278-0238.2017.6(4).2726-2731

Keywords:

Buccal patches, muco-adhesive, chitosan, sodium HPMC, natural polymer

Abstract

This study is mainly focused on the ability of polymer to increase the bioavailability of Furosemide and to release the drug in controlled predetermined manner. The polymers selected for the study include natural and synthetic polymer like Chitosan and sodium HPMC based on their physicochemical properties. The mucoadhesive buccal patches were prepared by solvent casting method. The prepared patches were subjected to physical evaluations, in vitro diffusion studies and stability study. All the formulations have shown good adhesive property, tensile strength, folding endurance, thickness, pH and moisture content. The diffusion studies have shown that the percentage drug release is from natural polymer (chitosan) based patches is more than the synthetic polymer (sodium HPMC) (89.5% to 97.89%) with chitosan based mucoadhesive patches and 72.97 to 88.75 patches prepared with sodium HPMC in 6 hours. The In vitro drug release, evaluation, stability and accelerated stability studies of the mucoadhesive patches shown that the formulation containing natural polymer 2% has the promising results with 97.89% drug release within 6 hours, folding endurance 211+2, patch thickness 0.7mm, surface pH 6.7, % swelling index 36% moisture content 3.3,tensile strength 2.94+3kg/cm2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jain NK. Controlled and Novel Drug Delivery, CBS Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi, 1997,1: 52-81

Chowdary KPR, ShrinivasL. Mucoadhesivdrug delivery: Areview of current status Indian drug 2000: 37 (9):400-405

.Khanna R, Agrawal SP Ahuja A. Mucoadhesivebuccal drug delivery system: A potential alternative to conventional therapy Indian journal PharmaSci 1998, 60 (1):1-11

American Academey of pediatrics. Clinical Report. Alternate route of drug administration. Advantage and disadvantage (subject Review). Padiatics, 1992, 100(1):143-152

Tora-ToraGorahowski. Principals of Anatomy and physiology,Geradi.Tora-Tora and sandro Reynolds Gorahowski, publishedCollins collagepublishers, 1992:7:770-774.

Ross and Wilson. Anatomy and physiology in health and illness, Anne Waugh and Allison gorav published byChurchill livinstone Edinburgh, 2001,9:289-293.

Rajesh B. Gandhi and joseph R. Robinson. Oral Cavity as a site forbioadhesivedrug delivery. Adv drug Del Rev. 1994, 13:43-74.

DevidHaris and joseph R. Robinson Buccal drug delivery via the mucous membrane of the oral cavity. Journal Pharm Sci. 1992,81(1):1-9.

Published

2017-07-15

How to Cite

Singh, A. ., & Sharma, U. K. (2017). Formulation and evaluation of Buccal patches of Furosemide. International Journal of Research and Development in Pharmacy & Life Sciences, 6(4), 2726 - 2731. https://doi.org/10.21276/IJRDPL.2278-0238.2017.6(4).2726-2731